Patent 11698687

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

PTAB activity (1)

AIA trial proceedings — IPR, PGR, CBM — filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced directly from the PTAB Trial API.

1 active
  • IPR2025-01071IPRfiled May 30, 2025vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Trial Instituted

Cached for 24 hours. Status strings are sourced verbatim from the PTAB API; the colored badge is our heuristic classification.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11698687. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 11698687 includes:

  1. Case Name: IPR2025-01071

    • Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner: Unified Patents (as petitioner)
    • Defendant(s)/Patent Owner: CM HK Limited
    • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
    • Case Number: IPR2025-01071
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided snippets, but the case is active in 2025.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Pending - Instituted. CM HK Limited, the Patent Owner, has requested that the Board deny institution of the inter partes review. The projected final written decision due date is August 12, 2026. The petition to institute inter partes review was filed by [[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.) ("Samsung").

  2. Case in Texas Eastern District Court

    • Plaintiff(s): Likely CM HK Ltd (as the current assignee of the patent).
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided information, but often involves the petitioner of the IPR, such as Samsung.
    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 2:24-cv-00880
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided information.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active. This is mentioned as one of the parallel district court actions.

  3. Case in California Eastern District Court

    • Plaintiff(s): Likely CM HK Ltd (as the current assignee of the patent).
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided information, but often involves the petitioner of the IPR, such as Samsung.
    • Jurisdiction: California Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 4:24-cv-06567
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided information.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active. This is mentioned as one of the parallel district court actions.

  4. Case in California Eastern District Court

    • Plaintiff(s): Likely CM HK Ltd (as the current assignee of the patent).
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided information, but often involves the petitioner of the IPR, such as Samsung.
    • Jurisdiction: California Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 3:24-cv-06567
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided information.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active. This is mentioned as one of the parallel district court actions.

The plaintiff(s) for the district court cases (Texas and California Eastern District Courts) are inferred to be CM HK Ltd because they are the current assignee of US11698687, and patent owners typically initiate infringement litigation. The defendant(s) are inferred to be entities like Samsung, who are challenging the patent at the PTAB, but this is not explicitly stated for the district court cases in the provided snippets.

Generated 5/16/2026, 12:47:19 AM