Patent 11690782
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 11690782 based on the USPTO Open Data Portal (ODP) API and a comprehensive web search. This indicates that the patent has not yet been challenged in an Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceeding at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Strategic summary
As of today, 2026-07-04, all claims of US patent 11690782 are UNTESTED by the PTAB. There are no records of any IPR, PGR, or CBM proceedings having been filed against this patent. This means that a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all prior-art grounds available for potential PTAB challenges, subject to statutory time bars. The absence of PTAB activity can sometimes indicate that a patent has not been heavily asserted, or that prior art challenges have not been deemed strong enough to warrant a PTAB petition. However, it also means the patent owner has not had to defend the patent's validity against AIA trial challenges, so the claims have not been "hardened" through such proceedings.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 11690782, a defendant facing assertion of this patent should consider conducting a thorough prior art search to evaluate potential grounds for an Inter Partes Review (IPR) or Post-Grant Review (PGR) challenge. The absence of previous PTAB challenges suggests that the patent's claims have not been subject to the heightened scrutiny of an AIA trial, and therefore, an IPR or PGR could be a viable defensive strategy. It is worth noting that well-asserted patents often attract IPRs, so the lack of activity could also mean the patent has not yet been widely asserted.
Generated 7/4/2026, 6:45:29 PM