Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US Patent 11675791 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested, because specific prior art references are not provided in the patent text or the "Prior art" section of the Google Patents page.

The "Prior art" section on the Google Patents page for US11675791B2 only lists "Prior art keywords" (data, clients, client, providers, server) and a "Prior art date" (2013-03-15) [cite: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11675791](/patent/US11675791)/en]. To conduct a proper obviousness analysis, I would need actual prior art documents (e.g., other patents, publications) to compare against the claims of US11675791 and identify combinations that a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine. Without these specific references, it is not possible to identify combinations or explain motivations for combining them.