Litigation summary

The previous search for "IPR2025-01190 Unified Patents" or "IPR2025-01190 PTAB" did not yield direct information about the specific parties and filing date for this particular IPR. The results discuss general PTAB procedures and other IPR cases from 2025 but not IPR2025-01190.

The patent text explicitly states "PTAB case IPR2025-01190 filed (Settlement)" and gives a link to Unified Patents: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2025-01190. While I cannot directly click the link, the fact that the patent itself provides this as a reference with "Unified Patents PTAB Data" suggests Unified Patents is the petitioner or involved. However, to be precise about "Plaintiff(s)" and "Defendant(s)", I need to either find a direct entry for this IPR case on Unified Patents, or state that the specific parties are not publicly available through my search methods for this particular case.

I will attempt a final, very specific search to see if any result can directly provide the petitioner and patent owner for IPR2025-01190, or its exact filing date, before concluding that information might be limited for this specific IPR through my current search capabilities.

Given the information available so far:

• US District Court Case: I have a clear result for this.

  • Plaintiff: Hannibal IP, LLC
  • Defendant(s): [[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.) et al
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
  • Case Number: 4:25-cv-00200
  • Filing Date: 2025-02-27
  • Outcome/Current Status: Open/Ongoing (implied by lack of termination date in and patent text mentioning "litigation" generally).

• PTAB Case IPR2025-01190:

  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2025-01190
  • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement (as stated in the patent text).
  • Plaintiff(s) / Defendant(s) / Filing Date: The search results are not yielding these specific details for this exact IPR. The patent text mentions "Petitioner: "Unified Patents PTAB Data"", implying Unified Patents might be associated with the petitioner, but it's not a definitive "Plaintiff" statement.

I will formulate a very precise query for the PTAB case using the patent number and IPR number, and specify "parties" or "petitioner".Here is a list of known litigation involving US patent 11641661:

1. US District Court Case:

   • Plaintiff(s): Hannibal IP, LLC
   • Defendant(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.
   • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
   • Case Number: 4:25-cv-00200
   • Filing Date: 2025-02-27
   • Outcome or Current Status: Open/Ongoing. The case was active as of a last docket date of 2025-03-13, with no termination date indicated.

2. PTAB Case:

   • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
   • Case Number: IPR2025-01190
   • Filing Date: Not publicly available through the provided search results.
   • Plaintiff(s) (Petitioner): Not explicitly named in the provided search results, though the patent itself mentions "Unified Patents PTAB Data" in relation to the petitioner.
   • Defendant(s) (Patent Owner): Not publicly available through the provided search results.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Settlement, as stated in the patent's legal status information.