Patent 11608915

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11608915. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 11608915 includes cases in the Ohio Northern District Court, New Jersey District Court, and Delaware District Court.

Here are the details of the known litigation:

  • Case 1:

    • Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court
    • Current Status: Active litigation is indicated by Google Patents.
    • Additional details: A joint motion for extension of case deadlines was filed by Plaintiff Telebrands Corporation.

  • Case 2:

    • Jurisdiction: New Jersey District Court
    • Case Number: 3:24-cv-08626
    • Plaintiff(s): YANGJIANG XINTE SPORTS TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
    • Defendant(s): TELEBRANDS CORP.
    • Filing Date: August 21, 2024
    • Outcome/Current Status: The case was terminated on October 4, 2024. The complaint requested declaratory judgments of noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,608,915 and 10,174,870.

  • Case 3:

    • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
    • Case Number: 1:25-cv-00365 (This appears to be a different case than the one identified in a previous search as 1:15-cv-00741 which has already been dismissed).
    • Plaintiff(s): Yangjiang Xinhe Houseware Co., Ltd.
    • Defendant(s): Telebrands Corp.
    • Filing Date: March 24, 2025
    • Outcome/Current Status: Defendant's motion to dismiss was granted on February 11, 2026, and the action was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The case involved U.S. Patent Nos. 11,608,915 B2 and 10,174,870 B2. The patents remain enforceable despite the dismissal.

  • Case 4:

    • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
    • Case Number: 1:15-cv-00741
    • Plaintiff(s): Ragner Technology Corp. & Tristar Products, Inc.
    • Defendant(s): Telebrands Corp., Scott True Value Hardware, Inc., and True Value Company
    • Filing Date: August 26, 2015
    • Outcome/Current Status: The case was dismissed with prejudice on April 29, 2024, by stipulation between the co-plaintiffs and co-defendants. This case involved two U.S. patents covering expandable hose technology, including 11,608,915 (though the specific patent numbers in this 2015 case are not explicitly listed with the 11608915 number in the provided snippet for the specific patent, other snippets connect Telebrands and expandable hose patents, making it likely related to the family).

Generated 6/2/2026, 12:03:11 PM