Patent 11573939

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

Obviousness Analysis of U.S. Patent 11,573,939 under 35 U.S.C. § 103

An invention is considered obvious if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA). This analysis evaluates the single independent claim of U.S. Patent 11,573,939 (the '939 patent) in light of prior art references cited in the patent's own documentation. The priority date of the '939 patent is August 12, 2005, which serves as the critical date for evaluating the state of the art.

Deconstruction of Independent Claim 1

Independent Claim 1 of the '939 patent can be broken down into the following key elements:

  • [1a] A television output display.
  • [1b] A remote control with up, down, left, right, and select functionality.
  • [1c] A computer processor within the television.
  • [1d] A process of associating items in a database with item identifiers (e.g., names).
  • [1e] A step-wise selection process:
    • Displaying initial "parts" of item identifiers, each corresponding to a set of items.
    • Upon selection of a part, displaying "additional parts" corresponding to a subset of the previously selected set.
  • [1f] A process of combining the selected parts to build a "larger part" of an item identifier.
  • [1g] Displaying the constructed larger part on the screen.
  • [1h] The displayed parts for selection are shorter than the complete item identifier.
  • [1i] The sets of items corresponding to the displayed parts are mutually exclusive.
  • [1j] The selection is enabled by mapping the remote's directional keys to parts positioned in a circular menu on the display.

Proposed Obviousness Combination

The claim is rendered obvious by the combination of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0113825 ("Perlman") in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,593,913 ("Jellyvision") and the general knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA).

  • Primary Reference: Perlman (US 2002/0113825 A1)
    Perlman, published on August 22, 2002, teaches a comprehensive system for selecting data, such as movies, on a television. It explicitly discloses a system with a television display, a set-top box with a processor (an obvious precursor to an integrated TV processor), and a remote control with directional and select keys (Perlman, FIG. 2). The system allows a user to navigate a database of items (e.g., movies identified by titles) and progressively filter or "whittle" down the list by making a series of selections from displayed categories (Perlman,-). This directly teaches the foundational elements of the '939 claim, including the TV, remote, processor, database of items with identifiers, and a step-wise selection process to narrow down results.

  • Secondary Reference: Jellyvision (US 6,593,913 B1)
    Jellyvision, issued on July 15, 2003, is directed to a system for text entry on a device with a limited input mechanism, such as a remote control. It specifically teaches the method of displaying characters or parts of a string on a screen, allowing a user to select them sequentially, and combining these selected parts to construct a larger desired string (Jellyvision, Abstract, Col. 5, lines 3-13). This directly addresses the elements of the '939 claim that are not explicitly detailed in Perlman's category-based filtering system: specifically, the concept of building an identifier piece-by-piece by selecting "parts" and combining them into a "larger part" that is then displayed.

Motivation to Combine

A person of ordinary skill in the art in 2005, seeking to improve the efficiency of the data selection system in Perlman, would have been motivated to incorporate a more direct method for searching when a user knows the name of the desired item. While Perlman's category-based filtering is useful for browsing, it is inefficient for direct look-ups. The PHOSITA would have looked to known methods for text entry on television systems.

Jellyvision provides an established solution for exactly this problem. The motivation would be to integrate Jellyvision's character-by-character (or "part-by-part") construction method into Perlman's television environment. This would create a more versatile system, allowing users to either browse by category (as in Perlman) or directly spell out the name of the item (as in Jellyvision). This combination is a predictable application of a known text-entry technique to a known content-selection system to achieve the expected result of faster and more direct searching.

Mapping of Combined Art to Claim Elements

  • [1a, 1b, 1d]: The TV display, remote, and database of items with identifiers are explicitly taught by Perlman.
  • [1c]: Perlman teaches a processor in a set-top box. By 2005, integrating this processing capability directly into the television was a well-known and obvious trend in consumer electronics to reduce complexity and cost, making it an obvious design choice for a PHOSITA.
  • [1e, 1f, 1g, 1h]: The core concept of selecting parts and combining them to build and display a larger identifier is directly taught by Jellyvision. Applying this method within Perlman's system—for example, by having the user select "J" from a first menu, then "O" from a second menu to build "JO"—is the direct and intended result of the combination. The fact that the selected parts are shorter than the whole identifier and represent mutually exclusive sets of results (e.g., items starting with "J" vs. items starting with "K") is inherent to this process.
  • [1j]: The use of a "circular menu" is the final element. Perlman teaches using a four-way directional pad for selection. For a PHOSITA designing an interface to present four or five options corresponding to these directional inputs, a circular or cruciform layout is a conventional, ergonomic, and obvious design choice. It creates an intuitive visual mapping between the physical buttons on the remote and the virtual options on the screen. This does not constitute an inventive step but rather a routine design implementation falling within the skill set of an ordinary UI designer at the time.

Based on this analysis, the combination of Perlman's television selection environment with Jellyvision's text-building methodology, implemented using a conventional circular menu layout, would have rendered the invention claimed in U.S. Patent 11,573,939 obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art as of the priority date.

Generated 5/13/2026, 12:18:28 AM