Patent 11468497

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Monticello Enterprises LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 11468497 as of the most recent ingest.

Strategic summary

As of June 1, 2026, there are no AIA trial proceedings (IPR, PGR, or CBM) on file for US patent 11468497. This means that all claims of the patent are currently untested by the PTAB. The absence of PTAB activity could indicate several things, such as the patent being relatively new (filed 2022-01-31, granted 2022-10-11) or not yet having been extensively asserted against potential infringers.

The estoppel landscape is completely open, as no prior art grounds have been litigated at the PTAB. Therefore, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all potential prior-art grounds available for an IPR or PGR petition, assuming they meet the statutory requirements for such a filing.

Recommended next steps

If a defendant is currently being asserted against using US patent 11468497, the absence of PTAB activity means that filing an AIA trial proceeding, such as an Inter Partes Review, is a viable option to challenge the patent's validity. This would be a first-mover advantage, as no previous challenges have hardened the patent.

Generated 6/1/2026, 12:48:16 AM