Obviousness

I cannot perform a detailed obviousness analysis of US patent 11374215 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as the provided patent text does not include a "Prior Art" section listing specific prior art references. While "Prior art keywords" (active material, particle, scaffolding matrix, electrode composition, battery) and a "Prior art date" (2012-08-24) are listed, these do not constitute specific references that can be combined to assess obviousness.

To conduct an obviousness analysis, I would need a list of specific prior art documents (e.g., other patents, publications) to identify their disclosures and then explain:

1. How the elements of the claims of US11374215 are found in these prior art references.
2. Why a person having ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would have been motivated to combine these references, with a reasonable expectation of success, to arrive at the claimed invention.

Without specific prior art references, I am unable to identify combinations or articulate motivations to combine them.