Patent 11301880
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Alpha Modus Corp
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for U.S. Patent 11,301,880.
Strategic summary
As of today's date, June 1, 2026, U.S. Patent 11,301,880 has not been subjected to any AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This means that all claims of the patent (claims 1-48, 50-77, and 79-91, including independent claims 1, 15, and 28) are currently untested by the PTAB.
The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent claims have not yet been challenged through these administrative mechanisms, or at least no challenges have reached the public record of institution or final decision. This lack of challenge means there is no PTAB-based estoppel for any potential petitioner, leaving all prior art grounds (§ 102, § 103, § 112, as applicable for IPR/PGR/CBM) available for a new petition.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for U.S. Patent 11,301,880, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all avenues open for a potential AIA trial challenge. The first step would be to conduct a thorough prior art search to identify strong grounds for invalidating the asserted claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103. Given the ongoing litigation, initiating an IPR or PGR could be a viable defense strategy to challenge the patent's validity in parallel with district court proceedings. The one-year statutory deadline for filing an IPR from the date of service of a complaint alleging infringement would be a critical consideration.
Generated 6/1/2026, 12:48:56 AM