Patent 11222349

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 11222349. The patent is currently untested by PTAB challenges.

Strategic summary

As of the current date, US Patent 11222349 has all its claims (1-20) untested by any AIA trial proceedings. This means that a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have the full range of prior-art grounds available for an IPR or PGR petition, assuming they meet the statutory requirements for filing. There is no estoppel landscape to consider from previous PTAB challenges for this patent. The absence of PTAB activity could be a signal that the patent has not yet been asserted widely or that any prior assertions have not prompted a PTAB challenge.

Recommended next steps

No PTAB activity exists for US Patent 11222349. If you are a defendant facing assertion of this patent, consider initiating an AIA trial proceeding (e.g., IPR) if strong prior art can be identified, as the claims have not been previously challenged and thus are not "hardened" by surviving PTAB review.

Generated 5/27/2026, 12:45:29 AM