Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US patent 11206670 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested, because the necessary specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publication details) are not provided in the "Prior Art section of this page" or elsewhere in the provided patent text.

The "Prior art keywords" listed on the Google Patents page (bandwidth, carrier, subordinate, MIB, resources) and the general background information provided in the patent's "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION" section (discussing 3GPP UMTS, LTE, MTC, and LTE Releases 8/9/10) describe the general state of the art. However, a proper obviousness analysis requires comparing the claims of US11206670 to specific disclosures in identified prior art documents. Without these specific references, it is not possible to:

1. Identify combinations of prior art references.
2. Explain why a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine them.