Obviousness

I cannot perform the requested obviousness analysis of US patent 11126889 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based solely on the information provided.

The "Prior art keywords" section of the patent lists general terms ("user", "road", "images", "mind", "autonomous vehicle") and a "Prior art date" (2017-07-05). However, it does not provide specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publication identifiers, academic papers, or other disclosures) that can be combined or analyzed to assess obviousness.

To conduct an obviousness analysis, specific prior art documents are required to identify their teachings and determine if a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine them to arrive at the claimed invention with a reasonable expectation of success. Without these specific references, it is impossible to identify combinations or explain the motivation to combine them.