Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US patent 11096797 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested. The provided patent text does not include a "Prior Art" section that lists specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications) against which the claims of US11096797 would be evaluated for obviousness.

The "Prior art keywords" and "Prior art date" listed in the Google Patents information are general metadata and do not provide the detailed content of specific prior art documents necessary for a § 103 analysis. Similarly, the "Cross-Reference to Related Applications" lists related patent family members, which are not typically used as prior art in an obviousness challenge against the present patent itself.

To conduct a proper obviousness analysis, I would need a list of specific prior art documents and their detailed disclosures to compare against the claims of US11096797 and determine a motivation for combination.