Patent 11076735

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (3)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11076735. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Litigation History for U.S. Patent 11,076,735

As of today's date, May 12, 2026, U.S. Patent 11,076,735 has been involved in several legal disputes. The following is a list of known litigation involving this patent.

1. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

  • Plaintiff: Bissell Inc.

  • Defendant: International Trade Commission

  • Intervenor: Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

  • Case Number: 24-1509

  • Filing Date: The record for this specific appeal was established from the preceding ITC investigation.

  • Status: Decided. The court affirmed the International Trade Commission's ruling that Tineco's redesigned products, which feature a firmware update allowing for brief battery charging during the self-clean cycle, do not infringe on Bissell's patent.

  • Plaintiff: Bissell Inc.

  • Defendant: International Trade Commission

  • Intervenor: Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., et al.

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

  • Case Number: 24-1709

  • Filing Date: The record for this specific appeal was established from the preceding ITC investigation.

  • Status: Active/Pending.

2. U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)

  • Complainant: Bissell Inc.

  • Respondents: Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and others.

  • Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

  • Investigation Number: 337-TA-1304

  • Filing Date: The investigation was instituted based on a complaint filed by Bissell.

  • Status: The ITC initially found that Tineco's products infringed the patent but later determined that redesigned products with a firmware modification did not infringe. This decision was the subject of the appeal to the Federal Circuit (Case No. 24-1509).

  • Complainant: Bissell Inc.

  • Respondents: Multiple parties.

  • Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

  • Investigation Number: 337-TA-3601

  • Filing Date: Details on the filing date are part of the ITC record.

  • Status: The record indicates a case was filed, but further details on the specific timeline and outcome require a deeper search of the ITC's EDIS database.

3. U.S. District Court

  • Plaintiff: Bissell Inc.
  • Defendant: Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
  • Case Number: 1:22-cv-00150
  • Filing Date: The case was filed in early 2022.
  • Status: The proceedings in this district court case were likely stayed pending the outcome of the parallel investigation at the International Trade Commission. The current status would be influenced by the Federal Circuit's recent decision.

Generated 5/12/2026, 11:32:11 PM