Prior art

To identify the most relevant prior art for US patent 11057896, I will examine the "Cited By" section of the patent on Google Patents, which lists patents and publications that have cited US11057896. Then, I will focus on the "Prior art" section of US11057896 itself to see what references were considered during its examination. For each relevant prior art reference, I will provide the requested details and assess its potential anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102.

Unfortunately, the provided patent text does not include the full list of "Prior art documents" or "Cited by" documents with their full citations, descriptions, or specific claims they anticipate. The "Prior art keywords" section mentions "coreset," "monitored," "coresets," "pdsch," and "search space," indicating the general technical areas of relevant prior art.

To provide the most relevant prior art for US11057896, I would typically need to access the full patent document from the USPTO or a similar patent database that lists all cited references. The current information only shows:

Prior art keywords:

• coreset
• monitored
• coresets
• pdsch
• search space

Without the actual list of cited prior art documents, I cannot fulfill the request to provide full citations, publication/filing dates, brief descriptions, and which claims they potentially anticipate under 35 U.S.C. § 102.

To complete this task, I would need to perform the following steps:

1. Access a reliable patent database (e.g., USPTO Patent Center or Google Patents directly) and navigate to US Patent 11057896.
2. Locate the "References Cited" or "Prior Art" section.
3. For each listed prior art patent or publication:
   • Extract the full citation (e.g., patent number, publication date, inventor/assignee).
   • Briefly describe its disclosed technology, especially concerning QCL assumptions, CORESETs, PDSCH, CSI-RS, and beam operations.
   • Compare the elements of the prior art to the independent claims (Claims 1, 10, and 11) of US11057896 to determine which claims, if any, could potentially be anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102. (A prior art reference anticipates a claim under 35 U.S.C. § 102 if it discloses every single element of that claim, either explicitly or inherently, in a single reference).

Since I cannot directly access or parse a dynamic, external database like the USPTO website for the complete list of cited prior art, I am unable to provide the detailed analysis of specific prior art references as requested.