Patent 11048300
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Lepton Computing LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 11,048,300. This means the patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. For a defendant, this indicates that all claims of the patent remain untested at the PTAB, and no claims have been invalidated or sustained in such proceedings. Therefore, the defensive posture is that the patent remains unhardened and an IPR challenge is still a viable option for a defendant.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent 11,048,300 are currently untested at the PTAB. This means there is no estoppel landscape established by prior AIA trial proceedings, and all prior art grounds remain available for a potential petitioner. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent may not have been aggressively asserted or that previous assertions did not lead to an IPR challenge.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 11,048,300, the absence of PTAB activity means that an Inter Partes Review remains a viable option to challenge the patent's validity. You would not be estopped by any prior PTAB decisions. You could research potential prior art to form the basis of a petition.
Generated 6/1/2026, 6:47:28 AM