Patent 11037094B2
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 11037094B2 as of the current date, based on both the USPTO Open Data Portal API and web searches. This indicates that the patent has not yet been challenged through Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) trials.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US Patent 11037094B2 (claims 1-19) are considered UNTESTED in the context of AIA trial proceedings. Since no IPR, PGR, or CBM trials have been filed, there is no estoppel landscape established under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). This means that all prior art grounds remain available for potential challengers to raise in a future PTAB proceeding or in district court litigation. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet attracted formal challenges to its validity via these mechanisms.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 11037094B2, the recommended next steps for a potential defendant would be to thoroughly analyze the patent's claims against all available prior art to identify potential invalidity grounds. Should an assertion of this patent occur, all avenues for challenging validity, including filing an IPR or PGR petition (if timing requirements are met), would be open. The absence of prior PTAB challenges means that any future petitioner would not be subject to estoppel based on previous AIA trials.
Generated 7/2/2026, 6:46:57 PM