Patent 11037092B2
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 11037092B2. All claims of the patent remain untested by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This provides a defendant with a clean slate regarding PTAB challenges, as no claims have been invalidated or confirmed patentable through these specific proceedings.
Strategic summary
As of today, 2026-07-02, all claims (1-27) of US patent 11037092B2 are UNTESTED by any AIA trial proceeding at the PTAB. There are no claims canceled, sustained, or currently under review in IPR, PGR, or CBM trials.
The absence of PTAB proceedings means there is no estoppel landscape to consider under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). A potential defendant facing assertion of this patent is not barred from raising any prior-art grounds in a future PTAB petition, as no grounds have been raised or could have been reasonably raised in a concluded trial.
There is no discernible pattern of PTAB activity, as no proceedings have been filed. This indicates that either the patent has not yet been aggressively asserted in a manner that would typically provoke PTAB challenges, or any assertions to date have not led to such challenges.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 11037092B2, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have the option to pursue an AIA trial (such as an Inter Partes Review) to challenge the patentability of the claims. The absence of prior PTAB challenges means there's no judicial estoppel or prior PTAB findings to navigate.
The lack of PTAB activity can be a signal that the patent has not been widely asserted or that prior art challenging its claims has not yet been fully explored in this forum. If a defendant believes strong prior art exists, filing an IPR could be a viable strategy to challenge the patent's validity before the PTAB.
Generated 7/2/2026, 6:47:32 PM