Obviousness

The request asks for an obviousness analysis of US patent 11025573 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, requiring the identification and combination of prior art references with a motivation for such combinations.

However, the "Prior Art" section provided in the patent text for US11025573 only lists "Prior art keywords" (user, contact, potential, location, request) and a "Prior art date" (2015-07-22). It does not include a list of specific prior art documents (e.g., other patents, publications, or non-patent literature) that can be used for an obviousness analysis.

Without specific prior art references to analyze for their teachings and disclosures, it is not possible to identify combinations of prior art that would render the claims of US11025573 obvious, nor to articulate a detailed motivation for combining them. A proper obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 requires comparing the claimed invention to the teachings of specific prior art references available before the patent's priority date.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to identify combinations of prior art references and explain the motivation for combining them based on the information provided.