Patent 10924188
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Radiant Patents LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file with the USPTO Open Data Portal for US Patent 10,924,188 as of the most recent ingest. A web search for additional, unindexed proceedings also did not yield any results. This indicates that, to date, the patent has not been subjected to IPR, PGR, or CBM challenges before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity currently exists for US Patent 10,924,188, a defendant facing assertion of this patent should be aware that all claims are currently presumed valid and have not been tested in an AIA trial. The absence of PTAB challenges for a patent involved in active litigation (as noted in the litigation summary) is a notable signal, suggesting that the patent owner has not yet faced a direct challenge to the validity of these claims at the PTAB. However, this also means that an IPR or PGR petition remains a viable defensive strategy for a new defendant, as there are no estoppel bars from prior PTAB proceedings.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:07:06 PM