Patent 10917483
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
The USPTO ODP API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent as of the most recent ingest. No additional PTAB activity was found through web search. This indicates that US10917483 has not been challenged in an AIA trial.
Strategic summary
As of 2026-06-19, all claims of US10917483 remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means there are no canceled or sustained claims due to PTAB decisions. The estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) do not apply to this patent, leaving all prior-art grounds available for a potential future petitioner.
The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent may not have been aggressively asserted or that potential challengers have not yet deemed it worthwhile to pursue an IPR, PGR, or CBM.
Recommended next steps
No PTAB activity exists for US10917483. A potential defendant facing assertion of this patent would have the full range of prior art and invalidity arguments available for a PTAB challenge, should they choose to pursue one.
Generated 6/19/2026, 12:46:29 AM