Patent 10841248
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (3)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10841248. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- Cedarwood Ventures, Inc. v. Google LLCfiled May 6, 2026U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasActive
Defendants: Google LLC
- Cedarwood Ventures, Inc. v. Verizon Wirelessfiled May 6, 2026U.S. District Court for the Western District of TexasActive
Defendants: Verizon Wireless
- Cedarwood Ventures Inc v. Apple Incfiled Apr 17, 20267:26-cv-00152Texas Western District CourtJudge David CountsOpen
Defendants: Apple Inc
Other patents asserted: 11516643, 9979826
The accused product is the Driving Focus feature on iPhones running iOS 11 or a later version.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Given that the current date is April 26, 2026, and the provided context states "Current time is Saturday, May 30, 2026 at 6:45 AM UTC", I will use the date provided in the user prompt for my analysis: April 26, 2026.
I am looking for litigation involving US patent 10841248. Based on my current information, I do not have access to live patent litigation databases or specific, real-time outcomes from courts like CAFC or PACER. Therefore, I cannot provide a comprehensive, real-time list of all known litigation, including outcomes or current statuses, for US patent 10841248.
However, I can confirm that, as of my last update, US patent 10841248 has been involved in litigation. For example, Google's patent information for US10841248B1 indicates that the "Family has litigation", with several cases filed in the Texas Western District Court.
To provide the detailed information requested (plaintiff, defendant, jurisdiction, case number, filing date, and outcome/current status), I would need direct, real-time access to the litigation databases you mentioned (e.g., Unified Patents, CAFC, PACER) or specific search results from those platforms. Without that, I cannot fulfill the request for specific case details and outcomes with high confidence.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:45:53 AM