Prior art

The USPTO website provides a "Patent Public Search" tool for searching patents and patent application publications. To identify the most relevant prior art for US patent 10810579 and determine which claims it potentially anticipates, I need to access the full patent document from the USPTO database, specifically looking at the "References Cited" section.

Unfortunately, I cannot directly perform live searches within the USPTO Patent Public Search tool to retrieve the complete list of cited prior art for a given patent number. My current capabilities allow me to search for general information about the USPTO and how to conduct patent searches, but not to execute specific patent database queries and extract detailed citation lists directly from the USPTO system.

However, based on standard patent analysis practices, prior art typically includes:

• Other patent documents (both granted patents and published applications).
• Publications or documents describing similar concepts.
• Products or public displays/sales of products.
• Public knowledge about a product or invention.

During the patent examination process, a patent examiner conducts a prior art search to determine if an invention is novel and non-obvious. If prior art is found that is identical or very similar to the claimed invention, the application may be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (for lack of novelty) or 35 U.S.C. § 103 (for obviousness).

To fulfill this request accurately, I would need to either:

1. Have direct access to the "References Cited" section of US10810579 from an authoritative source (like the Google Patents link provided in the initial prompt, which typically lists these citations).
2. Be able to perform a deep, structured search within the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool to extract the cited documents and then analyze each one.

Since I am unable to perform option 1 without being explicitly provided the citation list and am limited in my ability to perform option 2, I cannot definitively identify the most relevant prior art and which claims it potentially anticipates without that information.