Patent 10783899
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Cerence Operating Company
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of May 29, 2026, there are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review) on file for US Patent 10,783,899 at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This means the patent's claims have not been challenged or adjudicated at the PTAB.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent 10,783,899 (Claims 1-23) remain untested by AIA trial proceedings at the PTAB. This means that no claims have been canceled or sustained through IPR, PGR, or CBM. The estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) do not apply, as there have been no Final Written Decisions. Consequently, all prior-art grounds, including those that could have been raised, are still available for potential future challenges, whether at the PTAB or in district court litigation. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet faced an inter partes challenge regarding its validity based on prior art at the USPTO.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of PTAB activity for US Patent 10,783,899, the recommended next step for a defendant facing assertion of this patent would be to conduct a thorough prior art search to assess the validity of the claims. If a strong prior art basis is identified, initiating an Inter Partes Review (IPR) at the PTAB could be a viable defensive strategy to challenge the patent's validity. This patent has not yet been subjected to PTAB scrutiny, which is a common occurrence for well-asserted patents.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:04:11 PM