Patent 10778989
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for U.S. Patent 10,778,989 as of today's date, May 29, 2026. This indicates that the patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims (1-18) of U.S. Patent 10,778,989 remain untested by PTAB proceedings. No claims have been canceled or narrowed through IPR, PGR, or CBM. The estoppel landscape is entirely open, meaning potential petitioners are not barred from raising any prior art grounds they could reasonably assert. There are no patterns of repeated challenges by the same petitioner or aggressive appeals by the patent owner to consider, as no proceedings have occurred.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for U.S. Patent 10,778,989, a potential defendant facing assertion of this patent should consider the absence of prior challenges as a significant signal. Well-asserted patents often eventually attract IPRs. A defendant should perform a thorough prior art search to identify potential grounds for an IPR or PGR challenge, evaluating the claims against relevant prior art that may not have been considered during original prosecution. This proactive step can inform a robust defense strategy, should the patent be asserted.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:01:57 PM