Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for US patent 10715806 as requested. The "Prior Art" section of the provided patent text only lists "Prior art keywords" (images, media metadata, source, media, decoded) and a "Prior art date" (2013-03-15). These keywords do not constitute specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications, or other documents) that can be combined and analyzed to determine obviousness.

A proper obviousness analysis requires identifying specific prior art documents, determining what each document discloses, and then explaining why a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of these specific documents to arrive at the claimed invention, with a reasonable expectation of success. Without identifiable prior art references, this analysis cannot be conducted.