Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis for US patent 10650285 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on the provided text.

The "Prior art keywords" section of the patent merely lists keywords (e.g., "property," "characteristic," "condition," "image," "processing circuitry") and does not identify specific prior art references (such as other patents, publications, or products) that predate US10650285. While the "Related Applications" and "Other versions" sections mention patent applications and publications (e.g., US15/714,376, US20200143212A1) within the same patent family, these are not independent prior art references for the purpose of an obviousness analysis of the granted patent claims.

To conduct an obviousness analysis, specific prior art references with publication dates prior to the priority date of US10650285 would be required. These references would then be examined for teachings that, alone or in combination, would render the claims of US10650285 obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.