Patent 10623095
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of May 29, 2026, there are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10,623,095. This indicates that the patent's claims have not been challenged in an Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceeding at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). For a defendant, this means the patent has not been subjected to PTAB scrutiny, and all claims are currently presumed valid as issued by the USPTO.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent 10,623,095 (claims 1-18) are currently UNTESTED at the PTAB. There are no claims that have been canceled or sustained through an AIA trial proceeding.
Since no PTAB proceedings have been filed, there is no estoppel landscape under § 315(e)(2) for potential petitioners. All prior-art grounds, including those previously discussed in the "Prior art" section of this analysis (e.g., US20140376909A1, US20150155934A1, US8514390B2), remain available for assertion in a new PTAB petition, assuming statutory deadlines for filing such petitions are met.
The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet been significantly challenged by adverse parties in this forum. This could be due to various reasons, such as recent assertion, ongoing settlement discussions, or strategic choices by potential petitioners.
Recommended next steps
Given the current lack of PTAB activity, a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 10,623,095 should consider initiating an AIA trial proceeding, such as an Inter Partes Review (IPR). The strong prior art identified in the "Prior art" section, particularly US20140376909A1, US20150155934A1, and US8514390B2, provides a solid foundation for challenging the patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103.
The absence of prior PTAB challenges means there are no prior unfavorable institution decisions or final written decisions to navigate. The patent owner has not had the opportunity to "harden" the claims against PTAB challenges.
A prompt review of the relevant claims against the identified prior art by PTAB counsel is advisable to determine the optimal strategy and timing for filing an IPR petition. There is no information about any PTAB activity on file for US10623095.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:02:56 PM