Patent 10469554

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10469554. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • Untitled case
    23-1965Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As of April 26, 2026, the following litigation involving US patent 10469554 is known:

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

  • Case number: 23-1965
  • Case number: 26-1047
  • Case number: 26-1080
  • Case number: 26-1146

District Court (Utah District Court)

  • Case number: 2:23-cv-00552
  • Case number: 2:23-cv-00553
  • Case number: 2:24-cv-00066
  • Case number: 2:23-cv-00624

District Court (Delaware District Court)

  • Case number: 1:21-cv-00532
  • Case number: 1:23-cv-00987
  • Case number: 1:21-cv-00531
  • Case number: 1:23-cv-00986
  • Case number: 1:23-cv-01000
  • Case number: 1:23-cv-01305

District Court (Texas Eastern District Court)

  • Case number: 2:21-cv-00132

District Court (New York Southern District Court)

  • Case number: 1:23-cv-08971

International Trade Commission

  • Case number: 337-TA-1265

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

  • Case number: IPR2025-00467 (Not Instituted - Procedural)
  • Case number: IPR2024-00903 (Final Written Decision)
  • Case number: IPR2024-00045 (Final Written Decision)
  • Case number: IPR2024-00514 (Not Instituted - Procedural)

For most of these cases, specific plaintiffs, defendants, and filing dates are not readily available in the provided search results. The outcomes are noted where available for the PTAB cases. Further investigation using services like PACER would be needed to obtain comprehensive details for each district court and CAFC case.

Generated 5/27/2026, 6:45:35 PM