Patent 10380873B1
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: RICMIC LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10380873B1 as of the most recent ingest from the USPTO ODP API, nor did web searches surface any older or recently-filed proceedings. This suggests that the patent has not yet been challenged through IPR, PGR, or CBM trials at the PTAB.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US Patent 10380873B1 (Claims 1-13 as a system and Claims 14-20 as a method) are untested in AIA trial proceedings. There is no estoppel landscape to consider as no IPRs have been filed, meaning all prior-art grounds are still available for a potential future challenge. The absence of PTAB activity is notable, especially given the ongoing litigation in various US District Courts. Well-asserted patents often become targets for IPRs; therefore, the lack of such proceedings for US10380873B1 might indicate a relatively recent assertion campaign or a strategic decision by potential petitioners to pursue other avenues.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US10380873B1, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all potential prior art and statutory grounds available for an AIA trial challenge (e.g., IPR, PGR). The absence of PTAB challenges thus far means there is no "hardened" aspect to the patent in terms of having survived such review.
Generated 6/24/2026, 6:46:03 AM