Patent 10380873
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of the current date, there are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10380873 in the USPTO Open Data Portal. This means the patent has not been subjected to IPR, PGR, or CBM trials, and all claims currently remain active and unchallenged through these specific post-grant review mechanisms.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent 10380873 are currently UNTESTED in AIA trial proceedings. There are no canceled, sustained, or narrowed claims as a result of IPR, PGR, or CBM actions.
Since no AIA trial proceedings have been filed, there is currently no estoppel landscape under § 315(e)(2) for this patent. All prior-art grounds remain available for potential future challenges.
The absence of PTAB activity suggests that this patent, as of now, has not been directly challenged via these mechanisms by third parties. This could indicate several possibilities: the patent may not yet be widely asserted in litigation, potential challengers may have chosen other avenues, or the patent's claims may be perceived as sufficiently robust to deter such challenges.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of PTAB activity, a potential defendant facing assertion of US Patent 10380873 would find all claims currently intact. If a defendant believes there are strong prior art grounds to challenge the patentability of the claims, initiating an AIA trial proceeding (e.g., an Inter Partes Review) could be a viable defensive strategy. The absence of prior PTAB challenges means that a petitioner would have a clear field to present their best prior art.
Generated 6/24/2026, 6:45:30 AM