Patent 10080394

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Shane Michael Johnston

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is no PTAB activity on file for US patent 10080394.

Strategic summary

As there are no PTAB proceedings on file for US patent 10080394, all claims (1-20) remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means that no claims have been canceled or sustained through IPR, PGR, or CBM. The estoppel landscape is entirely open, as no petitioner has been barred from raising prior-art grounds. The absence of PTAB activity could suggest that the patent has not yet been asserted aggressively enough to attract IPR filings, or that potential petitioners have not yet identified strong prior art grounds.

Recommended next steps

Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 10080394, a potential defendant facing assertion of this patent would have a full range of prior art grounds available for an IPR or PGR filing, should they choose to pursue that avenue. The absence of PTAB activity is a signal that the patent has not been subjected to the scrutiny of an AIA trial, which can be both an opportunity (no hardened claims) and a challenge (no claims have been invalidated to narrow the scope of assertion).

Generated 6/1/2026, 12:45:59 AM