Patent 10018371
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Ecofactor, Inc.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10,018,371 according to the USPTO ODP API. Therefore, as of today, May 29, 2026, the patent's claims remain untested by PTAB proceedings. This means a defendant facing assertion of this patent will need to evaluate all claims as potentially valid and consider initiating their own AIA trial challenge if deemed appropriate.
Strategic summary
As there are no PTAB proceedings on file, all claims of US Patent 10,018,371 (Claims 1-24) remain untested and are considered sustained as issued by the USPTO. There is no estoppel landscape to consider, as no prior art grounds have been litigated at the PTAB for this patent. There is no pattern of PTAB filings, as no such filings exist.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 10,018,371, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to conduct a thorough prior art search and invalidity analysis to determine if grounds exist for an AIA trial. The absence of PTAB activity could suggest either that the patent has not been heavily asserted in contexts where IPRs are typically filed, or that previous challenges did not result in formal PTAB proceedings.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:05:07 PM