Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. is the American holding company for the Italian eyewear giant Luxottica Group S.p.A. Founded in 1961, Luxottica is a subsidiary of the Franco-Italian multinational corporation EssilorLuxottica S.A., which is publicly traded on the Euronext Paris exchange. Headquartered in Milan, Italy, the parent company EssilorLuxottica is the world's largest company in the eyewear industry, with a global workforce of nearly 200,000 employees and reported revenues of approximately €28.5 billion in 2025.
Luxottica is a vertically integrated company that designs, manufactures, distributes, and retails eyewear globally. Its portfolio includes iconic proprietary brands such as Ray-Ban, Oakley, Persol, Oliver Peoples, and Costa Del Mar. The company also manufactures frames under exclusive license for dozens of luxury and fashion brands, including Chanel, Prada, Giorgio Armani, and Versace. Luxottica's extensive retail operations include well-known chains like Sunglass Hut, LensCrafters, and Pearle Vision, along with optical departments in retailers like Target. The company also owns EyeMed, one of the largest vision insurance providers in the United States.
As a defendant in one tracked U.S. patent case and a plaintiff in none, Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. presents the litigation posture of a large operating company defending its products against patent assertions. The single case is not in a jurisdiction known for attracting a high volume of non-practicing entity (NPE) litigation. This pattern is consistent with a manufacturer and retailer of consumer goods rather than an entity focused on patent licensing or enforcement.
The company's only tracked litigation is E-Vision Optics, LLC et al. v. Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in October 2023. The plaintiffs, E-Vision Optics and e-Vision Smart Optics, allege infringement of patents related to electronic eyewear and smart glasses technology. In response, a related Luxottica entity has challenged the validity of at least one of the asserted patents before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The case is part of a broader campaign by E-Vision, which has filed similar patent infringement lawsuits against other major electronics companies.