Defendant

Google, Inc.

1 case as defendant.

Company profile

Google LLC is a multinational technology company founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Since a 2015 corporate restructuring, Google has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of its parent holding company, Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL). Headquartered in Mountain View, California, Alphabet is one of the world's largest technology companies, reporting revenue of $350 billion in 2025 and employing 190,820 people as of December 31, 2025.

As Alphabet's largest subsidiary, Google oversees the parent company's core internet-related products and services. Its operations span online advertising technologies, a dominant search engine, cloud computing via Google Cloud, and a wide range of software and hardware. Major product lines include the Google Search engine, the Android mobile operating system, the Google Chrome web browser, and the Google Workspace productivity suite. The company also develops consumer electronics such as Pixel smartphones, Nest smart home devices, and Fitbit wearable technology.

Based on the provided data, Google is an operating company that has been a defendant in patent litigation. The single tracked case shows Google as one of several defendants, a typical posture for a large technology firm facing suits from patent assertion entities. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, a common venue for patent disputes.

The tracked case is I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al., filed in 2011. The plaintiff, I/P Engine, alleged that Google's advertising systems, such as AdWords, infringed on its patents related to filtering internet search results. A jury initially found in favor of I/P Engine in 2012, awarding approximately $30.5 million in damages. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed this verdict in 2014, ruling that the asserted patent claims were invalid.

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al.

Reversed on appeal
Docket:
2:2011cv00512
Filed:
2011-09-15

A jury initially found infringement and awarded over $30 million in damages. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment on August 15, 2014, finding the asserted claims of the '420 patent invalid for obviousness. The district court's judgment and awards were subsequently vacated in January 2016.