Untitled case
Final Written Decision issued- Docket:
- CBM2014-00020
A Covered Business Method (CBM) review challenging the validity of the '137 patent. This proceeding was one of several similar challenges that resulted in a Final Written Decision.
Defendant
1 case as defendant.
DataTreasury Corporation is a privately held company founded in 1998 by Claudio Ballard. Originally established in Melville, New York, the company later relocated its headquarters to Plano, Texas. DataTreasury is a small entity, with a reported employee count of two in 2010. Publicly available revenue figures are not current, but litigation settlements and licensing fees have reportedly earned the company hundreds of millions of dollars over its history.
DataTreasury Corporation is a non-practicing entity (NPE) that does not manufacture products or offer operational services. Its business is centered on licensing and enforcing a patent portfolio related to digital image capture, centralized data processing, and electronic storage, particularly for check processing. The company's own website states it provides "licensing services" for its intellectual property. Critics in the banking industry have characterized DataTreasury as a "patent troll," a label the company disputes by asserting it is a pioneer whose innovations were adopted by banks without permission.
The company's patent-litigation posture is that of an aggressive patent asserter. As shown in the provided case data, DataTreasury has been the plaintiff in nine of the ten tracked suits, with no record of being a defendant in an infringement case brought by an operating company. The lawsuits were predominantly filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue historically favored by patent plaintiffs. This litigation strategy began in the early 2000s and targeted dozens of financial institutions and technology companies for infringing patents essential to the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21) framework.
DataTreasury has engaged in high-profile litigation against many of the largest U.S. banks. Notable defendants listed in the case data and public reports include JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and U.S. Bank. The company has secured significant settlements and licensing agreements from numerous parties over the years. In one case that went to trial, a jury found U.S. Bank guilty of willful patent infringement, resulting in a judgment of over $50 million. These enforcement actions have generated substantial revenue for the company.
A Covered Business Method (CBM) review challenging the validity of the '137 patent. This proceeding was one of several similar challenges that resulted in a Final Written Decision.