Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC et al. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Dismissed- Docket:
- 2:07-cv-00343
Similar to the case against Amazon, this lawsuit was part of a broader campaign by Marshall entities. It was dismissed, likely due to a settlement.
Defendant
1 case as defendant.
Barnes & Noble, Inc. is the largest retail bookseller in the United States. Founded in 1971 by Leonard Riggio through the acquisition of the original Barnes & Noble trade name, the company is headquartered in New York, New York. Since August 2019, Barnes & Noble has operated as a private company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited. The company operates approximately 700 bookstores across all 50 U.S. states and has an estimated 11,800 employees.
As a content and commerce company, Barnes & Noble's primary business is the sale of trade books, mass-market paperbacks, children's books, magazines, and newspapers. Its large-format retail stores also feature café services and sell a range of other products, including educational toys and games, gifts, music, and movies. The company operates an e-commerce website, BN.com, and maintains the NOOK digital business, which offers eBooks and related e-reader devices. Additionally, Barnes & Noble owns the educational service SparkNotes and the stationery and gift retailer Paper Source.
Based on the provided data, Barnes & Noble is an operating company that defends against patent lawsuits. The company is listed as a defendant in its single tracked case and has not appeared as a plaintiff. This posture is typical of a large operating company being targeted by patent assertion entities. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue historically favored by patent plaintiffs.
The company's only tracked litigation is a case brought by Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC. This entity name is characteristic of a non-practicing entity (NPE) whose primary activity is patent licensing and enforcement. The case, Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC et al. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., aligns with the common trend of operating companies in the retail and technology sectors facing patent assertions from NPEs in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions.
Similar to the case against Amazon, this lawsuit was part of a broader campaign by Marshall entities. It was dismissed, likely due to a settlement.