Patent 12150105
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) on file for US Patent 12150105 as of today's date, 2026-06-09. This gives a defendant a neutral defensive posture, as the patent's claims remain untested by the PTAB.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US12150105 are untested by AIA trial proceedings. No claims have been canceled or sustained by the PTAB.
Since there are no PTAB proceedings, there is no estoppel landscape under § 315(e)(2) to consider regarding prior-art grounds. All prior art grounds are theoretically still available for a potential future petitioner.
The absence of PTAB activity is a noteworthy signal. Patents that are actively asserted often become targets for IPRs or PGRs by defendants seeking to invalidate claims. The lack of such proceedings for US12150105 could indicate that it has not yet been widely asserted in litigation, or that potential challengers have not yet found compelling grounds for an AIA trial.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US12150105, the primary recommendation is to conduct a thorough prior art search and invalidity analysis. Since the patent has no PTAB history, all claims remain presumptively valid until challenged. An IPR or PGR could be a viable defense strategy, particularly if strong prior art (e.g., printed publications, other patents) is identified that was not considered by the USPTO examiner.
Generated 6/9/2026, 6:00:46 PM